Rockets hit neighborhood near Kabul airport amid US pullout
KABUL
Rockets struck a neighborhood near Kabul’s international airport on Aug. 30 amid the ongoing U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan. It wasn’t immediately clear who launched them.
The rockets struck on Aug. 30 morning in Kabul’s Salim Karwan neighborhood, witnesses said. Gunfire immediately followed the explosions but it wasn’t immediately clear who was firing.
The witnesses, who spoke on condition of anonymity for fear of reprisals, said they heard the sound of three explosions and then saw a flash in the sky. People fled after the blasts, they said.
U.S. officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment. U.S. military cargo planes continued their evacuations at the airport after the rocket fire.
In Washington, the White House issued a statement saying officials briefed President Joe Biden on “the rocket attack at Hamid Karzai International Airport” in Kabul.
“The president was informed that operations continue uninterrupted at HKIA, and has reconfirmed his order that commanders redouble their efforts to prioritize doing whatever is necessary to protect our forces on the ground,” the statement said, using an acronym for Kabul’s airport.
On Aug. 29, a U.S. drone strike blew up a vehicle carrying “multiple suicide bombers” from Afghanistan’s Islamic State affiliate on Aug. 29 before they could attack the ongoing military evacuation at Kabul’s international airport, American officials said. An Afghan official said three children were killed in the strike.
The U.S. is to withdraw from Afghanistan by Tuesday. By then, the U.S. is set to conclude a massive two-week-long airlift of more than 114,000 Afghans and foreigners and withdraw the last of its troops, ending America’s longest war with the Taliban back in power.
The U.S. State Department released a statement Sunday signed by around 100 countries, as well as NATO and the European Union, saying they had received “assurances” from the Taliban that people with travel documents would still be able to leave the country. The Taliban have said they will allow normal travel after the U.S. withdrawal is completed on Aug. 31 and they assume control of the airport.
However, Afghans remain fearful of the Taliban returning to the oppressive rule for which it was once known. There have been sporadic reports of killings and other abuses in the sweep across the country.
Earlier this week, an Islamic State suicide attack outside the airport killed at least 169 Afghans and 13 U.S. service members. The U.S. carried out a drone strike elsewhere in the country on Aug. 28 that it said killed two members of the Islamic State’s local affiliate in Afghanistan, which has battled the Taliban in the past.
UK government blasted over Afghan exit
The U.K. government on Aug. 29 faced a torrent of criticism after its hurried withdrawal from Afghanistan ended, leaving hundreds eligible for relocation behind.
Prime Minister Boris Johnson hailed a mission "unlike anything we have seen in our lifetimes" after the U.K. airlifted over 15,000 people in the last two weeks.
Troops landed back at Brize Norton airbase in southern England on Aug. 29 after Britain was forced to withdraw following the decision of its ally the United States to end its 20-year presence.
Johnson praised the evacuation efforts in "harrowing conditions" and assured the military that decades of deployment "were not in vain" after the Taliban retook control.
But current and former officials slammed government failings, suggesting many more Afghans could have been rescued.
The Observer leftwing broadsheet cited a whistleblower as saying thousands of emails from MPs and charities to the foreign ministry highlighting specific Afghans at risk from the Taliban takeover went unopened.
Foreign Minister Dominic Raab has already been strongly criticized for not immediately leaving a beach holiday when the Taliban took control.
The Observer said it saw evidence that an official email account set up by the Foreign Office to receive such pleas regularly had 5,000 unopened emails last week.
It said these included messages from ministers' offices and the leader of the opposition Labour party, Keir Starmer.
"They cannot possibly know [how many people have been left behind] because they haven't even read the emails," the whistleblower was quoted as saying.
The Foreign Office responded that its crisis team worked 24/7 "to triage incoming emails and calls".
Officials have given varying estimates of how many eligible Afghans did not board evacuation flights, the last of which left on Aug. 28, with the head of the U.K. armed forces General Sir Nick Carter putting this "in the high hundreds".
The Sunday Times rightwing broadsheet quoted an unnamed minister as saying: "I suspect we could have taken out 800 to 1,000 more people".
The same minister slammed Raab, claiming he "did nothing" to build ties with third countries from which Afghans might enter the U.K.
The Foreign Office acknowledged that Raab had delegated calls to his Afghan counterpart while saying he recently called his Pakistani counterpart.
The damning reports came after the Times reported last week that it found contact details of staff and job applicants left behind at the British embassy compound in Kabul, potentially endangering them.
Public opinion has been sharply divided in Britain over a high-profile campaign by an ex-serviceman, Paul or "Pen" Farthing who runs a British animal charity to evacuate his animals and staff from a shelter in Kabul.
Farthing managed to fly out on a privately chartered plane on Aug. 28 with around 150 cats and dogs on board, landing at Heathrow on Aug.29 morning.
He was hailed as a hero by supporters but opponents questioned the ethics of using official time and military support to evacuate animals as Afghans remained behind.
Tom Tugendhat, a Conservative MP and head of the Foreign Affairs Select Committee, told LBC Radio that an Afghan interpreter who had worked for the U.K. asked him: "Why is my five-year-old worth less than your dog?"
Richard Dannatt, a former head of the British army, told Times Radio that it "looks odd that we're giving prominence to a man and a lot of cats and dogs," while adding he doubted Farthing's flight prevented any Afghans leaving.
The focus should be on why Britain did not prepare better while knowing the danger faced by former interpreters and other locally hired civilians, Dannatt said.
He called for an inquiry into why the evacuation "happened in such a haphazard and chaotic fashion".
Raab acknowledged in The Sunday Telegraph that the Afghan situation was a "bitter pill to swallow".
To deal with the Taliban regime, the U.K. must build a wider international coalition of regional powers and other United Nations Security Council members, including countries "with whom we have a difficult relationship", he wrote.
