FTX founder Bankman-Fried allowed $250 mln bond, house arrest
NEW YORK
FTX co-founder Sam Bankman-Fried was released on $250 million bail on Dec. 22 while he awaits trial on criminal fraud charges over the spectacular collapse of his crypto exchange.
U.S. magistrate judge Gabriel Gorenstein made the ruling during Bankman-Fried’s arraignment hearing in federal court in Manhattan following his extradition from the Bahamas.
Bankman-Fried, who recently claimed to have only $100,000 left in the bank, will have to live at his parents’ home in Palo Alto, California, which has been put up as collateral under the terms of release, the judge ruled.
Bankman-Fried, who entered the courtroom in shackles and appeared unshaven, did not enter a plea.
He looked down as the judge reviewed the indictment’s eight criminal counts and made only a brief statement to accept the conditions of bail.
The parents, Stanford Law professors Joseph Bankman and Barbara Fried, sat silently throughout the 40-minute hearing. Bankman-Fried was later seen leaving the court carrying a brown paper bag.
Under the deal, the 30-year-old ex-billionaire, once touted as a possible future Warren Buffett, will be subjected to electronic monitoring.
FTX and its sister trading house Alameda Research went bankrupt last month, dissolving a virtual trading business that at one point had been valued by the market at $32 billion.
Prosecutors allege Bankman-Fried cheated investors and misused funds that belonged to FTX and Alameda Research customers.
Gorenstein determined that Bankman-Fried posed minimal risk of flight because he did not challenge extradition and has no prior convictions, accepting a recommendation from prosecutors.
Nicolas Roos, an Assistant US Attorney in the Southern District of New York, described Bankman-Fried’s alleged schemes as of “epic proportions,” with the government already holding “very strong” evidence from more than a dozen cooperating witnesses and encrypted text messages.
But Roos recommended bail with “highly restrictive” conditions in light of the defendant’s lack of criminal history and the fact that he had voluntarily agreed to be extradited.
