Turkish officials differ over NATO link of planned missile system

ANKARA

Presidential spokesperson İbrahim Kalın. AA Photo

Senior Turkish officials have differed over whether the planned new-long range missiles will be compatible with NATO systems, with a presidential spokesperson correcting the defense minister Feb. 23, stressing that these systems will surely be integrated with the alliance’s defense structure.

“As one of the most important countries in NATO’s security line, we will definitely ensure this integration and harmony,” a spokesperson for the presidency, İbrahim Kalın, told reporters at a press conference.
 
Kalın made this point upon a question on Defense Minister İsmet Yılmaz’s recent statement, in which he argued the system wouldn’t be integrated into the alliance’s system.

NATO member Turkey chose China Precision Machinery Import and Export Corp as a preferred bidder in 2013 to supply the missile system, prompting Western concerns about security and the compatibility of the weaponry with NATO infrastructure. NATO countries, particularly the United States, objected to the idea, pointing to the fact that these systems will not be integrated with the alliance defense structure.

In response to a parliamentary question, Yılmaz said last week Ankara did not plan to integrate the new defense system with NATO systems. Yılmaz said the evaluation of bids had been completed and no new offers had been received, but government officials later made clear that did not mean a final decision had been reached.

Eurosam, which is owned by Franco-Italian missile maker MBDA and France’s Thales, came second in the 2013 tender. U.S.-listed Raytheon Co. also put in an offer with its Patriot missile defense system, which is now operated by 13 countries around the world. There were reports that Eurosam renewed its bid to Turkey, but Yılmaz’s response to the parliamentary question refuted those reports. “The project will be financed through foreign financing. Work on assessing the bids has been completed and no new official bid has been received,” he said.

About half of Turkey’s network-based air defense radars have been paid for by NATO and are part of the NATO Air Defense Ground Environment, and Turkey’s decision to construct its first long-range system with a non-NATO country would make it a standalone system.

“Turkey can always decide to build a standalone system. But in that case, abstracting the air defense system from NATO assets would mean that Turkey will lose half of its radar capabilities,” one defense analyst had said.

Turkey would need interface data to make its own air defense architecture interoperable with NATO assets, primarily data on the Identify Friend and Foe system. This is a top secret system which cannot be installed into any Chinese system, the analyst said.