Talks in Geneva reopen shadowed by rival track
BEIRUT - Agence France-Presse
Since it broke out in March 2011, Syria’s conflict has killed more than 320,000 people, displaced millions and ravaged the country’s economy and infrastructure.
Efforts to end the war are now proceeding along two rival tracks: The formal political peace process hosted at United Nations headquarters in Geneva and, since January, parallel talks in Kazakhstan brokered by Russia, Iran and Turkey.
Observers say the U.N. appears to be scrambling to match Astana’s momentum after a landmark deal signed in Kazakhstan on May 4 that would create four “de-escalation” zones across some of Syria’s bloodiest battlegrounds.
U.N. special envoy Staffan de Mistura however stressed to reporters on Monday that the Geneva talks were working “in tandem” with the Astana process.
He has said the upcoming talks, which are expected to last just four days, aimed to “hit the iron while it’s hot”, with the hope that de-escalation on the ground can help push forward towards “a political horizon.”
Since the Astana deal came into effect a week ago, fighting has slowed across swathes of the country.
But in Damascus, which is not included in the deal, the government has secured the evacuation of three rebel-held districts, bringing it closer to exerting full control over the capital for the first time since 2012.
Numerous rounds of U.N.-backed talks have fallen short of producing concrete results, although during the last round in March the sides finally began discussing four separate “baskets” of issues: governance, a new constitution, elections and combating “terrorism” in the war-ravaged country.
Aron Lund, a fellow at The Century Foundation, said that despite Geneva’s important “symbolic value, it isn’t moving forward in any visible way.”
“In practice, the Geneva track has largely been sidelined by the Astana track, at least for now,” Lund said.
Delegations were arriving in Geneva yesterday, a day before the talks start.
The Syrian government team will be headed once again by its U.N. ambassador Bashar al-Jaafari.
The opposition delegation will be represented by the Riyadh-based High Negotiations Committee (HNC) and led again by Nasr al-Hariri and Mohammad Sabra.
The HNC has continued to call for the ouster of President Bashar al-Assad as part of a political transition, a demand seen as a non-starter by the Syrian regime.
“By design, the Geneva process revolves around this dead-end demand for a negotiated transition,” Lund told AFP.
“In terms of actually trying to stabilize Syria, the main effect of pegging peace to transition has been to marginalize the U.N. in Geneva and shift attention to Astana instead,” he said.
Turkey, Russia and Iran sponsored the first talks in Astana in late January to reinforce a faltering ceasefire.
They have since returned for several meetings, culminating this month in the safe zones deal.
Assad has brushed off the upcoming Geneva negotiations as “merely a meeting for the media.”
“There is nothing substantial in all the Geneva meetings. Not even one per million. It is null,” Assad said in a recent interview with Belarus’s ONT channel.
“As to Astana, the situation is different... This started to produce results,” Assad said.
De Mistura yesterday downplayed Assad’s comments, pointing out that the Syrian president had sent a large, high-level delegation to Geneva, and “they are empowered to serious discussions and they are here to work.”
He said his dealings with the government delegation had been “much more substantive than just those general comments that are made for the cameras.”
Syrian peace efforts have also been marked in recent months by Washington’s all-but withdrawal from the process under President Donald Trump. The previous U.S. administration, in particular then-secretary of state John Kerry, was deeply involved in the Geneva process but since Trump took office Washington has played little apparent role.